🔗 Share this article

Donald Trump's national security strategy offers a flawed view of the European Union. The document asserts that open-border policies and so-called "progressive" policies represent an existential threat to the continent's identity. Yet, this argument is based on a serious misinterpretation of the reality. The actual challenge confronting Europe is not cultural but economic and technological backwardness.

A Glaring Growth Divide Between the US and Europe

Statistics paint a sobering picture. Between 2008 and 2023, US GDP grew by 87%, compared to a paltry 13.5% increase for the European Union. During this time, EU GDP per capita fell from 76.5% to just half of the American figure. Remarkably, even Mississippi now boasts a higher per capita income than major European economies like France and Italy.

Currently, roughly 50% of the world’s top fifty tech companies are American, while only four are from Europe.

The Technological Deficit: The Core Question

The growing economic gap stems from stronger efficiency gains in the US, fueled by breakthroughs and higher total factor productivity. The scene of world technology leadership is decidedly US-centric. Over the past fifty years, hundreds of American startups have grown into companies valued at over $10bn, compared with just 14 in the European continent.

This disparity prompts a pressing issue: As the competition for tomorrow's sectors like AI, semiconductors, and quantum computing, where does Europe positioned? Experts widely concede it is largely a contest between two between the United States and China, with Europe starting at a significant disadvantage.

Underlying Factors of Europe's Technological Lag

Several major reasons account for this technological divide.

• Financing Ecosystem: The United States has a far deeper and agile network for financing new ventures. The EU still lacks a genuine unified investment market, which limits the scale of new firms.
• Bureaucratic Hurdles: Excessive and fragmented regulation hamper Europe. A American entrepreneur can launch a product under a single set of laws to access a market of over 330 million. The EU, despite a bigger population size, is split among 27 different national systems, creating significant internal barriers.
• Cultural Attitudes: Views on entrepreneurial failure vary greatly. In parts of Europe, a startup's collapse was historically viewed with stigma, whereas in the United States, it is often seen as a valuable lesson.
• Military Investment: The US benefits from a tightly woven academic-military-industrial complex. Europe's chronic underinvestment in defense has weakened its ability in pioneering research.

The Road Ahead: Reasons for Cautious Optimism

Despite these challenges, there are causes for optimism. European leaders are increasingly aware of the severe threat and have started to propose substantial change. Notable analyses on EU competitiveness and the internal market point to the necessity of sweeping changes.

With the right policies and regulatory reforms, Europe's strengths might enable far greater degrees of business-led breakthroughs.

Europe still possesses considerable advantages: skilled human capital, excellent education systems, and premier research institutions. Alongside a vast domestic consumer base and substantial household savings, these foundations have the potential to unleash a surge of venture creation.

Importantly, even if Europe does not take the lead in creating next-generation technologies, it can still dramatically increase productivity by implementing and tailoring advancements from elsewhere.

A Critical Juncture

The European Union now faces a decisive moment. To paraphrase a famous line, decline often happens "slowly, then all at once". So far, Europe's slide in innovation has been steady. But, without decisive action to tackle its deep-seated problems, today's slow erosion could give way to a rapid and permanent loss of world influence.